Uncategorized

shared content

“While I applaud the spirit of the Vinyl Vaults project, the copyright laws of the United States are a significant obstacle to any such effort. Unfortunately for Amoeba and music fans, U.S. copyright laws governing music are antiquated. Basically, unless a music composition was published before 1923, most compositions remain under copyright until 2019 or later. Much of the types of work in the Vinyl Vaults project will likely be protected until 2067. Accordingly, any project such as Vinyl Vaults must give serious consideration to avoiding copyright infringement claims made by copyright owner(s).

Daar adds that the rare nature of the music in Vinyl Vaults provides no defence legally. “The United States copyright laws do not contemplate or provide an exemption for out of print music compositions. In addition, there is no legal excuse for infringement even if it is done in good faith and the money from the infringement is held in trust. Accordingly, unless Amoeba has the express permission of the correct copyright owner(s) it runs the risk of being liable for copyright infringement,” he says.

“U.S. law is far from clear on how to deal with orphaned works, which is music where there is no clear knowledge of ownership. With the Vinyl Vaults project, Amoeba is charging for each download of its digitised and remastered tracks. Amoeba may be acting above board in its claims that it first seeks to track down and obtain the permission of rights holders (assuming who owns the rights is going to be clear) and then hold in trust the money paid for downloads for those it cannot find. However, it would appear that for such tracks, Amoeba may be found guilty of infringement if a copyright owner came forward and brought a copyright infringement lawsuit.”

http://ift.tt/1bSwTp6

Standard
Uncategorized

shared content

“It was inevitable, time marching on as it does, and yet it also hard to believe: Half a century has passed since the Beatles touched down in New York for the first time, on Feb. 7, 1964, and seduced the country with three performances on “The Ed Sullivan Show” and a pair of concerts, at the Washington Coliseum and Carnegie Hall. Everything about them — their pudding basic haircuts, their Cardin suits and pointed boots, their sharp, irreverent sense of humor — seemed outlandish, compared with American pop groups. And though their music was firmly rooted — as they were always quick to point out — in American rhythm and blues, soul and rock, they produced a sound that was fresh, energetic and unmistakably their own.”

http://ift.tt/1fz4Lsr

Standard
Uncategorized

shared content

“But anyway, did you hear about the time Beyoncé rejected a work by Lena Dunham’s mom? A fun anecdote: Jay Z wanted to buy “Walking Gun,” one of the most famous images by noted feminist artist Laurie Simmons, which depicts doll legs sticking out of the end of a pistol. (And you thought Tiny Furniture wasn’t autobiographical!) But once it arrived, Beyoncé promptly shipped it back, opting for a less gun-glorifying piece with a perfume bottle on it.”

http://ift.tt/1f5a1nn

Standard
Uncategorized

shared content

“The battle over the merit of trap isn’t about quality control. It’s really a collision of differing sets of criteria for what makes a good MC. Much of the objection to the Futures, Keefs and Flockas stems from the prevailing view that they can’t rap. This is a line of thinking steeped in a very specific and restrictive idea of what makes a good MC. It prizes lyrical dexterity almost to abstraction. Rhyming words really quickly is an important building block of good rap, but awful rap has come along that treasures it, and great rap has happened in its absence. Eminem’s last three solo albums are master classes in wordplay whose soullessness and stringency make them hard to listen to. Flockaveli’s lyricism is chantlike and methodically simplistic, but it is the gold standard for modern aggressive party rap. There’s more than one axis for measuring good rap, and classifying a Keef as awful just because he doesn’t stack up on the lyrical miracle axis ignores the terse and subtly influential brand of pop rap songwriting he mines on Finally Rich.”

http://ift.tt/1eaP0ZZ

Standard
Uncategorized

shared content

More crucially, the rap awards are given out before the broadcast begins. This is odd. Many, many people enjoy rap. (The opening of the official ceremony was a performance by Beyoncé, who was accompanied by a rapper named Jay Z, who is now of note mostly because he is Beyoncé’s husband, and he got to stand near her while she performed “Drunk in Love”; she set the bar unpleasantly high for the rest of the night by melting people with her voice and presence.) But all three rap Grammys went to the Opie Taylor and Andy Griffith of rap, Macklemore & Ryan Lewis. Macklemore’s “American Graffiti” hairdo and crushing earnestness make him very easy to mock, but it is almost impossible to indulge that feeling because the song that made them famous, “Same Love,” a duet with Mary Lambert, is a clever, well-crafted song about homophobia—particularly, that within the hip-hop community.

“Same Love” is a tough one—it’s basically impossible to be against this song, as cheesy as Macklemore and the song and the untempered sincerity of the project are. Hip-hop’s problem with homophobia is more than minor, genetically linked to thousands of bias crimes, reported and not, and when you’ve got teen-agers growing up listening to hip-hop (I do), it’s not so bad to have a straight guy stand up and say homophobia is uncool, and to be celebrated for it. So I am happy Macklemore is there, and for this song. But he didn’t need to win all three rap awards, or, at the official ceremony, be awarded Best New Artist over the m.c. Kendrick Lamar or the country singer Kacey Musgraves, both of whom will be relevant long after Macklemore has left music for talk radio.

http://ift.tt/1liN1qb

Standard
Uncategorized

shared content

Last week, Complex published an article by a Grammy voter detailing some parts of the system, which included this behind-the-scenes tidbit passed from one voter to the next: “Be careful about greenlighting an album by someone who was really famous if you don’t want to see that album win a Grammy.”

Macklemore isn’t more famous than Jay Z or Mr. West, but the nature of his fame is different — it’s likely to have registered with a wider swath of Grammy voters who would be comfortable voting for him in a way they might not have been for Mr. Lamar.

http://ift.tt/Mb5c13

Standard
Uncategorized

shared content

This online ad customization technique is known as behavioral targeting, but Pandora adds a music layer. Pandora has collected song preference and other details about more than 200 million registered users, and those people have expressed their song likes and dislikes by pressing the site’s thumbs-up and thumbs-down buttons more than 35 billion times. Because Pandora needs to understand the type of device a listener is using in order to deliver songs in a playable format, its system also knows whether people are tuning in from their cars, from iPhones or Android phones or from desktops.

So it seems only logical for the company to start seeking correlations between users’ listening habits and the kinds of ads they might be most receptive to.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/05/technology/pandora-mines-users-data-to-better-target-ads.html?ref=todayspaper

Standard